Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
In this case it was a by design *core* change that caused it. And as
such we did not come to the *SeaMonkey* user community to explicitly ask
about it.
Though in *theory* we could override the core choice here, I don't see a
strongly compelling reason to do so.
OK, that I understand. But I still have no clear recollection
of the Seamonkey team approaching this list with ideas for
future versions of Seamonkey and asking for feedback on
acceptability. Could you please let me (us) know whether
that is the norm, or are all decisions as to the evolutionary
route taken by a central cadre without seeking the advice
and opinions of the subscribers to this list ?
Trying to say this nicely, some developers are more concerned than others what
the users think. Does the phrase "it's FOSS, if you don't like don't use it, or
maintain your own version."
I'm just happy that there is a way around it, but I agree it's a bad default
because printing the screen uses way too much ink.
--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
We are not out of the woods yet, but we know the direction and have
taken the first step. The steps are many, but finite in number, and if
we persevere we will reach our destination. -me, 2010
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
