»Q«: >On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:09:12 +0200 >> Emerging thunar would still get me 14 new packages i do not want. I >> doubt thunar without gvfs can replace the filepicker. > >I'm sorry, I gave bad info. With the dbus flag, thunar does still >pull in gvfs, and I still had gvfs.
With "-dbus -xfce_plugins_trash" installation of thunar is bearable. http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/th120810.png (32 KB) >I don't actually use thunar, so now I've uninstalled both thunar and >gvfs. SeaMonkey still opens dolphin as the file manager. So gvfs is expendable. But dolphin is out of the question. That would result in 'Total: 78 packages (74 new, 2 in new slots, 2 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 320,255 kB'. *g* >> I doubt thunar without gvfs can replace the filepicker. > >Not the *picker* -- SM can only use the gtk picker or the Mozilla >one. But I do have SM using the file *manager* that I want, to open >directories either from the download manager or about:support. My thunar is not used by either. That may be because i do not use any desktop environment. thunar settings fails with hafi@i5_64 ~ $ thunar-settings Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.xfce.FileManager was not provided by any .service files Maybe inter alia the revenge for emerging thunar with -dbus. ;) hafi@i5_64 ~ $ cat ~/.config/xfce4/helpers.rc TerminalEmulator=Terminal MailReader=sylpheed-claws FileManager=custom-FileManager hafi@i5_64 ~ $ cat ~/.local/share/xfce4/helpers/custom-FileManager.desktop custom-FileManager.desktop [Desktop Entry] NoDisplay=true Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Type=X-XFCE-Helper X-XFCE-Category=FileManager X-XFCE-CommandsWithParameter=thunar "%s" Icon=thunar Name=thunar X-XFCE-Commands=thunar I do not have sylpheed-claws and TerminalEmulator should probably be xterm, but thunar-settings points to another problem. >> All of this has much to do with Gentoo but little with SeaMonkey and i >> believe we should stop discussing this on >> mozilla.support.seamonkey. ;) > >I still think there's enough to do with SeaMonkey, but I read >mozilla.general as well, Well so far nobody has complained. >if you want to take it there. But now I don't even know if there's >anything else to explore about this. You could suggest what i should do so that about:support works with thunar. :-D Hartmut _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
