On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:14:00 +0100, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > > Ed wrote: > > > > According to http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/ > > SeaMonkey is # 8 > > Then it is surely time for the Seamonkey council to tweak the dragon's > tail, and if their representations are not adequately addressed, to take > the matter to the European Court of Justice. I wonder if there are any > Seamonkey users who are also international barristers and who might be > willing to handle the matter on a /pro bono/ basis ?
According to the rules hammered out, one browser per organization/company. Although a community project, SeaMonkey nevertheless exists under the Mozilla umbrella. And we certainly can't afford $500 an hour lawyers dancing on the head of a pin while trying to explain the difference to the EU Competition Commission. Phil -- Philip Chee <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
