On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:06:42 -0400 "Dan B." <[email protected]> wrote:
> »Q« wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:45:42 -0700 > > NoOp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 08/10/2012 08:41 PM, Michael Gordon wrote: > ... > >>> Try using Google as your friend. Enter SeaMonkey in lower case, > >>> upper case, or mixed case; only the letter spelling will count, > >>> and then maybe not. > >> > >> Are you serious? > >> > >> Never mind, I reckon you are. Thanks for playing anyway. > > > > IMO, it's the best reply yet. ISTM that's what the overwhelming > > majority of new or prospective SeaMonkey users will do, not dry to > > drill down to it from mozilla.org's front page. > > That only applies to users who already know they want SeaMonkey. Yeah, that was the context of the discussion that went before; the OP was talking about people who were looking for SeaMonkey. > What about the people who don't know about SeaMonkey but might choose > to use it if, in looking for Firefox and/or Thunderbird, see SeaMonkey > listed as sibling product? For people who come to their site looking for Firefox, Mozilla is trying to give them the experience of finding it quickly without having to see stuff about anything else, including SeaMonkey. IMO, that's what they should be doing, but you know what they say about opinions.... _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
