Jim Taylor wrote:
On the corporate side, where end users have no choice about their antivirus product, I don't know if Symantec's corporate products detect the false positive or not. But even if they do I doubt that many large companies are using SeaMonkey as their standard browser and the individual users that may be running it are probably knowledgeable enough to deal with it, particularly if they are told about it in the release notes and known problems.
The key for most users would be to have the information /before/ installing, not after (do you read those things before or after? most people I know read them afterward). But it would have to be carefully worded so new arrivals wouldn't get the mistaken impression that it's /our/ problem and avoid SeaMonkey.
There seem to be two diametrically opposite experiences with Norton products. For some people like myself, it just quietly runs without problems. For some others, it's the program from hell. I wish I knew how to predict which would be which before installing. I mean, it's like a food allergy -- some people love shrimp, and others go straight to the hospital. It's not the shrimp's fault, and it's not the people's fault, either -- neither of them took any intentional action that can be blamed.
-- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
