On 2013-04-24 3:26 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John Bessa wrote:
and my view is that composer is the way to go.
Composer is extremely old and hasn't been looked after in many
years. I'd suggest, if you want something this simple, that you look
into BlueGriffon, which is still currently being developed.
<http://www.bluegriffon.org/>
...
Given that situation, and since BlueGriffon is a "next-generation Web
editor
based on the rendering engine of Firefox," how about the developers start
bundling /that/ instead of Composer?
Sure, take out the part that the rest of us use for what we do, and
replace with something that suits you better. Composer works perfectly
for what it does, ideal for small simple web pages, HTML documents, etc.
AFAIK, that's what BlueGriffon does.
"BlueGriffon is an intuitive application that provides Web authors
(beginners or more advanced) with a simple User Interface allowing to
create attractive Web sites without requiring extensive technical
knowledge about Web Standards."
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
Newsgroup moderator
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
