On 7/9/14 9:40 AM +0900, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Trane Francks:
<http://www.living-intentionally.com/media/images/msgpanehdr.png>
*IEEHHH* Meine Güte.
As always, pictures are better than many words. :)
Interestingly, I think I've found a bug. As you can clearly see from the
above screen shot, what you would expect to see as User-Agent is being
displayed as X-Mailer. *HOWEVER* ....
I toggled my View | Headers to Normal and then back to All and now the
view has completely changed:
<http://www.living-intentionally.com/media/images/aftertoggle.png>
That is as it should be.
As you can see, the headers being displayed have now changed. I am led
to surmise that over time, the code to display the headers in the
Message Pane has changed over time and that a toggle of the view
refreshes things.
So, try toggling your View | Headers | All to Normal and then back to
All.
I can not reproduce your first picture. Even after disabling Mnenhy and
restarting SM. I have tried several times switching from All to Normal
and back.
You should try with a fresh test profile.
It may very well fix your problem.
The problem, that X-Mailer is not shown as User-Agent in the header
pane? That was solved by disabling Mnenhy and restarting SM. So i am
taking back the word deterioration. In this case. ;)
What problem? That X-Mailer is not shown in the header pane?
It's being given a different name for some reason that I cannot fathom.
And now it appears to have been a bug. I have had View | Headers | All
as my choice since back in the Netscape Communicator days and have never
changed it till just now. For whatever reason, doing so has changed
everything.
And it does seem to be a bug. It seems to be necessary to toggle the
headers view between All and Normal and back again for every bloody folder.
Until someone can reproduce it i would hesitate to call it a bug. ;)
It would be better if X-Mailer would be displayed as X-Mailer in the
header pane, not as User-Agent. I fully agree with that. On the other
hand, despite of the naming, the content of the user agent is still
valuable. :)
I would rightly expect that X-Mailer is a completely separate header and
that if it exists at all, its content will be displayed independent of
User-Agent.
I wrote, that i agree with that. *g* But better the content with a wrong
name than no user agent at all.
Hartmut
Well, things seem to be fixed on my end. So, I don't see any issue
related to the subject. User-Agent is appearing in e-mail just fine.
--
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Trane Francks [email protected] Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
