Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> Paul Bergsagel wrote: >>> Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox >>> >>> Please scroll down to the second table: >>> >>> <http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os- claims-security-firm/> >>> >>> Thank you SeaMonkey developers!!! >> >> I find this rather improbable since SeaMonkey builds off the same >> Gecko/Toolkit code as Firefox and at the most I would expect a >> difference or +/- 1 >> >> Hence I would treat the other claims in that report with a bucket of >> sodium chloride. > > Could be true depending on the versions tested, which isn't clear from > the table. If they tested a year-old version of FF vs. a current version > of SM, there would be a large discrepancy. Unfortunately, the article > doesn't link to the original study.
The original article - see link below - appears to be written by an anonymous writer for "Microsoft Subnet, An independent Microsoft community" so naturally Windows is going to fare better. I think it is a sham, at least the operating system portion of the article. <http://www.networkworld.com/article/2887240/microsoft-subnet/apple-linux- not-windows-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-in-2014-ie-wins-worst- app.html> -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
