On 02/27/2015 09:39 PM, Philip Chee wrote: > On 28/02/2015 02:18, Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Paul Bergsagel schrieb: >>> Surprisingly SeaMonkey has been rated as more secure than Firefox >>> >>> Please scroll down to the second table: >>> >>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/mac-os-x-is-the-most-vulnerable-os-claims-security-firm/?tag=nl.e539&s_cid=e539&ttag=e539&ftag=TRE17cfd61 > > Thank you SeaMonkey developers!!! > >> This just confirms that a count of fixed vulnerabilities is a very >> bad measure for security. It just means that Firefox developers are >> more vigilant in finding and fixing security issues, while the small >> SeaMonkey team has no time to even look for any and just inherits >> platform fixes. > > For your information, I've been keeping a eye out that I've been > monitoring front end security patches landing in Firefox > (mozilla-central/browser) for more than a year and a half. I've been > porting these changes as they come in. Front end Firefox vulnerabilities > are pretty rare compared to backend problems. It is possible that I've > missed one or two, but I believe I've either fixed all known (front-end) > security issues or confirmed that they don't affect SeaMonkey. > > Phil >
Thank you Phil & all that contribute to SeaMonkey. @Kairo: Robert it seems that you've been dropping turds in here ever since you went over to Firefox. I've still a tremendous amount of respect for you, and always thank you for the many years you've contributed to SeaMonkey... but how about posting something positive/helpful/useful for a change? Or did I misunderstand and you were doing this all along? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
