On 24/03/15 06:32, [email protected] wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote:
On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote:
Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why "they" don't
separate
out the newer versions, maybe "they" only list the most popular two
individually.
There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can
change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc.
Phil
Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the "Top N" to 10
and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-(
2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's
been more active than any other individual version for about the last
week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put
together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the
rankings for the Top N are calculated!
Mark.
Yeap, you're right, it does show up in the top 15.
One would think the graph would show the most recent version, then the
"next best" two, and then "the rest", unless, of course, no-one is
downloading the most recent version.
Humm, looking at the SeaMonkey ADI vs Locale/Country, Australia even
makes it into the top 15 .... Yeah us!!
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
