On 12/20/2015 11:25 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Thank god that Seamonkey is far away from the 90-90 rule. One Firefox and one
Chrome and one Safari and one Edge is enough. They could stick with the crowd 
and
I care not a little bit about them. Ok, not exactly true. I care about the 
Firefox
backend because it's good and used in Seamonkey:)

The interface could use some improvements like SeaTab X 2 integration into the
browser and some updates here and there would be cool but otherwise I like it 
how
it is.

But the good thing about Seamonkey is that you can customize it. You might want 
to
share you thoughts with a Theme developer. Unfortunately Firefox might kill all
this in the near future so don't hold you breath.

I've been wondering what will happen to SeaMonkey when Fx dies next year. When XUL extensions and all complete themes for Fx are killed that kills Fx and it will be only an imitation of Chrome browser then. Since so much of SeaMonkey now is Fx code and many SeaMonkey users use Lemon Juice's converter in order to use some Fx extensions on SeaMonkey what will happen to SeaMonkey when Fx commits suicide?

FRG

On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:34:40 +0100, Paul Gheno wrote:

I do not want to be rude, to be critical, but the actual seamonkey UI is
far away from the 90-90 rule and I let you check why.
As a web navigator, I believe that is a good idea to stick as close as
possible to this kind of rule.

Thank you very much for reading guys, indeed.
Thank you for your next messages...

Paul



  Regards
  Frank-Rainer Grahl


_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to