On 07/02/2016 09:25 PM, Rick Armstrong Shaul wrote:
On 7/2/16 6:03 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 07/02/2016 08:59 PM, Rick Armstrong Shaul wrote:
Trying to see how to get more involved with SeaMonkey, so I started
using an Aurora build. It seems to be an outrageous CPU hog vs the
last stable common release. Is that normal?
SeaMonkey, version 2.42a2
Steadily, > 100% CPU use when just have two simple tabs open?
Details ...
You are currently on the aurora update channel.
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 SeaMonkey/2.42a2
Build identifier: 20160109013001
Just me?
Why still 2.42a2? Isn't there a update for Mac to 2.45a2?
Actually there is a 2.46a2.
<https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-aurora/>
It has Aurora in the path, but I think that's actually a nightly build
easing toward an Aurora candidate? Nightly builds not sure I'm ready
for.
Interesting, CPU is below 10% since I restarted it. Perhaps there was
some sequence of browsing I did that hit a weird processing loop. So
unless I see it happen again, nothing to see here, move along.
No, it is the latest-comm-aurora as the directory indicates, and it
should update daily if there are no problems with building.
As you can see the latest Mac version is dated 30-Jun-2016, while the
latest Linux is dated today and Windows is still version 2.44a2 dated
04-Apr-2016.
So it appears that they haven't been able to build a Mac version for a
couple days, and Windows is lost in build purgatory.
If I were you I would update.
--
Visit Pittsburgh <http://www.visitpittsburgh.com/>
The Roaring Twenty! <http://www.anthrocon.org/>
Deutschtown Music Festival <http://deutschtownmusicfestival.org/>
Pittsburgh Vintage Grand Prix <http://www.pvgp.org/>
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
