Ray_Net wrote: > I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels > When I use in html <img alt="xxxx" src="logo.jpg" height="79" width="79" > border="0"/> The rendering by SM is superb
Stands to reason... > BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this > picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture 1852x1852 > which is 2.042 KB KB? Not likely. You meant MB - megabytes - right? > To avoid this, I use Irfanview to shrink the picture to a 79 pixels x 79 > pixels so the end-user download this modified picture which is 14 KB That's more reasonable. > And the rendering of this picture <img alt="xxxx" src="logo-small.jpg" > height="79" width="79" border="0"/> by SM is poor. Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude. > Is it possible that SM download the logo.jpg picture - then applied the > reduction to 79x79 The height and width numbers in the HTML is what reduced the visual size of the image. SeaMonkey was instructed to do that by the web page. > - then save this new file somewhere - before showing > it in the final page ? Not if you re-save it and call it a different file name. > Can I retrieve this picture.file ? http://unknownwebsite.com/images/ > Or have you another bright idea ? Are YOU authoring this page? Give the URL. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
