Richard Alan wrote: > Ray_Net wrote: > >> I have a big image 1852 pixels x 1852 pixels >> When I use in html <img alt="xxxx" src="logo.jpg" height="79" width="79" >> border="0"/> The rendering by SM is superb > > Stands to reason... > >> BUT using this have a side effect that when the end-user have this >> picture on the web-page ... He downloaded the original picture 1852x1852 >> which is 2.042 KB > > KB? Not likely. You meant MB - megabytes - right? > >> To avoid this, I use Irfanview to shrink the picture to a 79 pixels x 79 >> pixels so the end-user download this modified picture which is 14 KB > > That's more reasonable. >> And the rendering of this picture <img alt="xxxx" src="logo-small.jpg" >> height="79" width="79" border="0"/> by SM is poor. > > Well, of course. You've reduced the quality by orders of magnitude. >
When reducing choose resampling over resize and pick filter for better quality. After resampling, especially so severely, try sharping the results, SHIFT+S -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
