Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Ray_Net wrote: >> WaltS48 wrote on 06-07-19 01:01: >>> On 7/5/19 6:40 PM, Ray_Net wrote: >>>> Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 05-07-19 02:32: >>>>> Ray_Net wrote: > >>> I think you will see a difference. >>> >> Ok, ... anyway other browsers can cope with the bad coding of the page. >> In fact you said that SM can only work with a perfect html page .... >> but internet is fully filled with pages that did not pass the W3.ORG >> check. >> >> So now, It appear that I must switch from SM to the couple "FireFox" - >> "Thunderbird". > > Might be better in one browser might be worse in one browser. Has > nothing to do with SeaMonkey. Both use the same engine. SM just an older > version with fixes. > > As a second browser I would recommend Chromium. Edge Chromium seems to > be turning out ok too. Sites wich does not like Gecko seem to be > optimized for Chrome these days and Firefox is becoming a permanent > worthless construction site anyway. > > FRG
Regarding a second browser, I am checking out Brave at the moment. It is also chromium based and includes many features to deal with privacy and advertising issues. Dave _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
