Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
I should have written that both PCs were running SM 2.49.5, NOT 2.95.
Henrik37 wrote:
Oops --
I should have written that both PC's were running SM 2.49.5, NOT 2.49.
Henrik37 wrote:
On my wife's 32 bit PC running Windows Seven Home and SM 2.95, sites
frequently fail to load properly and the following error message is
displayed: "SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER">SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER".
Any suggestions on hot to fix this problem?
On my 64 bit PC running Windows Seven Pro and SM 2.95, no such problem
is observed.
On both machines, Kaspersky Interner Security is the security software
in use. On both machines, Microsoft update shows that all updates are
in place.
Related: what are the respective Mozilla browser and e-mail software
versions that SM 2.95 is based on?
Thanks, in advance, for any suggestions, advice, and fixes.
Despite my having thoroughly screwed up this post, thanks to WaltS48 for
the info on from where SM 2.49.5 draws from Mozilla.
https://palant.de/categories/kaspersky/
Certificate failures are almost every time cause by the av software. I
would turn off any https scanning. The software plays man in the middle.
https://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?/topic/371162-how-to-disable-ssl-interception/
https://support.kaspersky.com/common/safemoney/12489
FRG
Thanks to FRG for the suggestions. I must say, however, at 82 I am having
a hard time getting what is left of my brainpower around this issue After
reading a large group of the Palant posts, it sounds like this is a more
severe problem than I could have ever imagined and that the AV vendors may
not have it fully under control yet. What is the best vendor's AV fix?
I am just using Microsoft Security Essenstionals on 7 but with the January
dealing stopping security updates I am not sure if Microsoft will provide
further updates past that date.
FRG
Windows Security Essentials was not the same beast back then, but I seem to
remember WSE updates for Win XP stopping when support for that level ran out.
There were articles in C't about WinXP and virus scanners back then, what I
remember was that most of the other companies said they were going to continue
updating their XP scanners for at least a year after MS stopped supporting the
OS.
I had a laptop with 1GB memory and XP and I finally nuked Avira there when it
was taking around 10 mins to boot just because of the - occasionally misfiring
- virus scanner. This means I have no idea how long Avira supported XP.
Worked till last April for XP x86 when extended support for the embedded
variant ended. Would prtobably have still worked with the current updates too
but they switched on later Windows support features in the update exe which no
longer runs because of it. XP 64 support ended fast. Given the fact that Win 7
will be supported for Enterrpise customers longer MSE might have some life
left. We will see.
Avira is junk. Needed to clean several PCs from friends and co workers after
viruses hit them. McAfee at work takes 99% cpu when scanning. So far all but
Windows Defender seem to be bad. Unless you need email scanning (I reply on
Brain 1.0 here) it should be enough.
FRG
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
