On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:31:26PM +0000, Russell Hedger wrote: > I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and > then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node > updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more often > the node sticks at 100 % and dies. Someone suggested IBM's version of Sun
Why does the load being 100% cause it to die? These are two separate phenomena. > java is more stable and faster on Linux, so I have installed this (it > certainly is no worse). I run a 3.2 GHz Athlon with 512 MB RAM. I have left > the java VM at 128 MB. An Athlon 3200+, you mean :) <rant deleted - I run a 2800+> > > The changes I have made to my freenet.conf file are thus: > > ipAddress=x.x.x.x > routingTableImpl=ng > storeSize=5000M > outputBandwidthLimit=20000 > threadFactory=Y > > Are these reasonable settings? Any settings would be gratefully received. Yes, as long as you are talking about an unstable network node. If you are on unstable, you should have routingTableImpl=ng. If you are on stable, you should have routingTableImpl=classic - but it's ignored anyway on stable. > > Russ -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
