On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: > > > I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying > > and > > then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my > > node > > updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more often > > the node sticks at 100 % and dies. Someone suggested IBM's version of Sun > > java is more stable and faster on Linux, so I have installed this (it > > certainly is no worse). I run a 3.2 GHz Athlon with 512 MB RAM. I have > > left > > the java VM at 128 MB. > > I didn't say that it is more stable, but that it is faster. > > I'had to put the JVM at 200 MB because I had some outofmemory exceptions, > but BTW it seems that latest builds use far less memory and threads since > multiplexing is available.
That's good to hear with all the reports of the latest stable using more RAM... > > Since, my node never died. It ran all the week end w/o any problem (other > than BW overload). That's especially encouraging. There are suggestions that there is a degradation-over-time bug relating to muxing... > > > The changes I have made to my freenet.conf file are thus: > > > > ipAddress=x.x.x.x > > routingTableImpl=ng > > storeSize=5000M > > outputBandwidthLimit=20000 > > threadFactory=Y > > > > Are these reasonable settings? Any settings would be gratefully received. > > It seems OK for me, but I'm quite new with the freenet, so I'm not an expert. > > Otherwise, I had also to increase the file descriptors allowed for the > user runninf the node (ulimit). > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
