> While ideas are being tossed around for the Windows installer and/or > configurator, which if either of them generates the default.ini and > freenet.ini files that appear during installation?
Dude... neither... The autogenerated config scripts are generated (as your image states!) by Freenet.scripts.Setup - which is a part of the Freenet core code. The header is built into the freenet .jar file, if you like. I agree that it's a bit unpleasant (and anybody know why the heck the header hardcodes the line termination character combination? That's a *really* dumb idea). But it was added because so, so, so many people didn't understand that changing a setting wouldn't take effect if it was still commented out by a % symbol. Some you win, some you lose. I like the idea of posting a .png image of a text file, by the way, nice touch :-) > For what it's worth, I have not noticed any problems with the Windows > configurator hardcoding or uncommenting any variables. Amen, brother. d _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
