Hi there, i used 'heavy' to describe the node update process a whole --> IRC connections & .... VS auto-update from nodes to nodes (+ a web site where people might catch/put their node id to get an entry point)
concerning your bot particularly, well it is far better than manual update of course, but the looks is still very 'underground' geek programming. nowadays a GUI is a must (even if not necessary) to the dumb-end-user!!! i don't know maybe a web/html front page interfacing your refbot.py would be (nice&easy) enough?? but to me the 'heavy' pb is from the update process itself... may the 'ubuntu'(*) be with you!! have a good day, brice (*) the concept not the distro On 3/5/07, David Sowder (Zothar) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brice Neant wrote: > as 'feedback is the breakfast of champions - the one minute manager' > here is some: > > freenet concept is great and thanks for bringing it to us > > > the 0.7 freenet experience is pretty tricky to the user: > good points: > -WEB interfaces to config the freenet is really good > -WEB access are really faster than w the 0.5 > > bad points: > -node management is really manual, i mean it's a pain-in-the-glass to > connect IRC, exchange then exchange, > exchange,exchange,exchange,exchange,exchange,........... that's not > great. even using the refbot.py is heavy (my point of view) Any ideas on how using refbot.py could be made less heavy?
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
