-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland wrote: > In a nasty centralised way of course, but with the current state of > technology and deployment ALL social networking is nasty centralized > crap - partly because of NATs, partly because of business models, and > partly because nobody has got around to implementing good peer to peer > social networking sites.
Actually one of the things we considered was making it non-centralised. Since no radical person would want to store their social network on the external server... getting them to put it on their computer would be problematic, but asking them to "login and provide names of your friends" is impossible. - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7JgcuWy2EFICg+0RAlncAKCukzVpzARp86UxKuUD6ptv/VWrcgCgvahO PxUh/gVxryercyyxfeNdpOs= =BSri -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
