On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:22:20PM +0000, Volodya wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > In a nasty centralised way of course, but with the current state of > > technology and deployment ALL social networking is nasty centralized > > crap - partly because of NATs, partly because of business models, and > > partly because nobody has got around to implementing good peer to peer > > social networking sites. > > Actually one of the things we considered was making it non-centralised. Since > no radical > person would want to store their social network on the external server... > getting them to > put it on their computer would be problematic, but asking them to "login and > provide names > of your friends" is impossible.
100% agreed! Post on -chat if you ever get something like this off the ground. It's such a pain to run a web server as a regular netizen, thanks to all the NATs and thanks to the hacks we have to do to work around them which are either themselves centralized or unreliable... :<< (See the current thread on devl)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
