On Friday 28 August 2009 02:51:23 test...@codingninjas.org wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > The cache (50g) portion of the datastore (100g) is indeed full. It has been > full for quite some time (not sure when it became full). It is the 'Store' > portion that is still only 22.0% (9.60GiB) full. > > I believe the average speed stated was usually around 85KiB/s. A lot of the > time I would check it it was in mid 90's. Never seen it below 60's for more > than a second and very rarely. By the way, just for your information: now > with > the new max connections change I only average 77.1KiB/sec. It was roughly 100 > for a while at the beginning (I suppose before many others had updated to the > new build), but later that day was down below the 85 average I had before the > change and has settled at 77.1KiB/s. > > So anyways, I realize the cache fills up much faster than 'Store'. But I > assumed that at 85KiB/sec for a year, the 'Store' would be more full than 9.6 > GiB. I am talking true 24/7, 99.9% uptime of freenet (only ever down to auto- > restart after auto-update, or due to system updates on the system requiring > restart). And if it maters, the store was set at 100g from the beginning. > > If that is normal behavior, that is fine I guess, although I think should be > improved, as it means that vast amounts of storage space are being wasted on > the freenet. What I was more thinking is it has to be a problem with my store > perhaps due to it being a year old and thus converted from old versions who > knows how many times, and perhaps corrupt as a result?
No, it is expected behaviour. We will try to improve this at some point as clearly it is suboptimal. Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe