On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:58 AM, freenet <free...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2009, at 17:16:24 +0100, bimbek <bimbek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban
>> the poor
>> guy.
>> I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
>> court
>> would say that using freenet is illegal...
> Did anyone catch the irony that the Freenet Project - that is
> dedicated to overcoming censorship and promoting absolute free speech
> for all worldwide - has just banned, censored if you will, someone
> from a simple support e-mail list?
> But from the Freenet web site at http://freenetproject.org/philosophy.html
> :
> "You cannot guarantee freedom of speech and enforce copyright law. It
> is for this reason that Freenet, a system designed to protect Freedom
> of Speech, must prevent enforcement of copyright."

Freenet must operate under the laws of both the US and the UK.  What's
surprising, exactly?

If you want support for illegal activities, don't look for it on
moderated, non-anonymous forums like this email list!  How surprising
is that?  Seriously, if you want to discuss illegal activities,
shouldn't you be using something like, I don't know, Freenet?

Evan Daniel
Support mailing list
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to