On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Yfrwlf <yfr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/12/2012 08:19 AM, Evan Daniel wrote: >> >> So is there a ZI package yet? > > > That sounds nice, you could make the ZI package/feed depend on JDK so there > were no longer any unfulfilled dependencies on the user's end regardless of > platform, since it would be automatically "installed". Instead of the > existing installer, you could have some of those things done with a > web-based first run setup wizard. Upgrades could be handled by ZI updates > instead of custom updaters, too. > > I don't know if redoing all that is worth it in exchange for certain perks > though, since Freenet has already implemented so many of its own systems to > make up for not having those systems exist across platforms. Perhaps ZI is > too late to the party. :)
It's not too late. Personally, I don't care at all about ZI, but if end users find it useful, I'm for it. Please let me know when it's available :) Evan Daniel _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
