Arne Babenhauserheide (2017-02-21 18:44:48 +0100) wrote:

> Do I remember correctly that the bundler replicates the site as is —
> with all its dangers to privacy? (Freenet provides heavy whitelist
> filtering to protect its users from uploaded content).

Sorry, but I do not know the software that much, but thanks for the
heads up, it'll be useful if we decide to work more on bundler.

> >> >   3. Access to censored dynamic content (i.e. web apps) is
> >> >   possible.
> >> 
> >> That’s a hard one. You’d need to remodel the web apps to use
> >> Freenet as backend instead of the clearnet.
> >> 
> >> I do not think that it is possible at all to provide anything which
> >> uses Javascript and at the same time preserve the anonymity of your
> >> users.
> >
> > Yeah, that's a hard one, that's why we may probably end up combining
> > several tools.
> You could even go as far as simply re-developing popular tools on top
> of Freenet as locally running tools. That might turn out to be easier
> than trying to secure javascript.

Yes probably, but we have limited resources and code reuse may save much
effort.  For some particular components providing a "more native"
solution may still be feasible, and the projects you're working (and
mainly babcom) on may be of special interest there.`:)`

Thanks again for your advice!

Ivan Vilata i Balaguer
Support mailing list
Unsubscribe at

Reply via email to