On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:18, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We
> > should also warn about it in the README...
> You mean the executable/jar can still be probed for on the filesystem?
> Maybe. But it can't be done via the network interface, if that iptables
> rule is in place--the port would appear as dead as any other unused
> port, as far as anyone except freenetuid would know.

I mean javascript port scanning. But yes you can do it with iptables rules.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available

Reply via email to