On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:18, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We > > should also warn about it in the README... > > You mean the executable/jar can still be probed for on the filesystem? > Maybe. But it can't be done via the network interface, if that iptables > rule is in place--the port would appear as dead as any other unused > port, as far as anyone except freenetuid would know.
I mean javascript port scanning. But yes you can do it with iptables rules. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090124/cffdd3f1/attachment.pgp>
