Title: Re: [support] is it ok to delete 'old'
Is there any reason to keep all the _old.102 files?  I'm still using ebase 102, but for every file, there is a corresponding _old (I assume from when I converted from the really ancient ebase a year or more ago).  Do they have any function? 

I expect you are right, these files are a legacy from the conversion from FileMaker version 4 to version 5. The only reason to keep the files is as an archive, and there are good reasons to take them off the active machine. Copy them to a removable disk and file them away.

 Also, since I'm doing some housekeeping,  I have several copies of ebase on my hard drive, renamed after crashes (I've always renamed and saved the crashed file) and then recovered using a backed up copy.  Does anyone see any reason to keep this stuff around?
 

Again, only as an archive, and these files _really_ should be removed from your active machine. Filemaker can be pretty creative about finding a workable file if the one it's looking for isn't available. For example, you crash, damage a file, and FileMaker finds one in another directory and opens it instead. You are working with a mixed file set and don't know it. Copy to a removable disk and toss them from the hard drive.

Is this stuff like 'mourning'...  you hang onto it for an appropriate period and then try to let go?
 

I guess, but in this case, they can come back to haunt you. Exorcise them.
------------------ Reminder to each recipient: To change your list account preferences, go to http://email.sparklist.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=support and enter the email address you used to subscribe to the ebase support list:: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- ebase - Relationship Management for Nonprofits, http://www.ebase.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to