On 1/26/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then my question to you is this .... why haven't > they been implemented?
Because nobody has submitted patches? > You've / we've all spent a lot of time on the > product to make it ( and I quote) a business class > product which "provides all the important features > of commercial firewall boxes" (BTW, it IS a great > product, just be open to suggestions for > improvments). I think not, as most of the > commercial products out there, [Cisco, NetScreen, > CheckPoint] to name a few, support most if not all > of the features I mentioned below, before getting > flamed as a FUD writer (look in the mirror before > pitching stones, and do so real research on > something other than BSD). I'm not sure what FUD > means, but I can make an educated guess, and I'm > not sure that there needs to be this level of > inappropriate and offensive > communications/responses, especially from a member > of the core dev team (certainly not very > professional). > > In short ... take of your BSD blinders and look > around before accusing someone of NOT doing their > research, certainly when someone make a concerted > effort to apologize for the noise ... then you > still feel the need to flame. > > BOOOOO .... BTW Google is a great tool!!!!! David, I think you have lost sight that we are all volunteers. We do not get paid for sitting here fielding 100 questions a day. Please do not forget this. Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
