Hello, I show the pftpx process is running on my beta4 machine, yet it has my LAN IP address. In the config.xml I have a <disableftpproxy/> yet i have no other instances of this in the config file anywhere. In the web interface I have it disabled in the LAN, and enabled in the WAN. I made these changes and rebooted, and still no effect. I have all the ports forwaded like I did on my .84 machine. Any way to force that ftpproxy application to use the right IP? Any insight on this would be great!
Thanks in advance! Brad On Thursday 01 June 2006 09:02, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Scott Ullrich wrote: > > On 6/1/06, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Should the FTP helper then run and be bound to the WAN-interface? > >> I can see all the other FTP-helpers bound on most other interfaces, but > >> I can't see it being bound to the WAN. > >> > >> (This on a late post-beta2-snapshot) > > > > Why are you asking about beta 2? Upgrade to beta 4 for support. > > I new you were going to say this (that's why I never bothered to bring > it up here). > ;-) > As it is, I've already installed the latest snapshot on an identical > machine next to the production one and I'm waiting for a small > downtime-window to try to switch it over. > > > The pftpx process should show up and in this case have the public ip > > of the firewall as one of its arguments. > > I can't access the post-BETA4-machine right now to check, but when I > moved the configuration over to the test-box, I think I still didn't see > the "right" pftpx process show up. > I have 4 VLANs bridged with WAN and several others that run completely > separate. > > > > > > cheers, > Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
