If bridging is not an option I would recommend setting 1:1 mappings for
each public address.  It will work beautifully and will also allow you
to set up two separate networks. 
-Tim 

-----Original Message-----
From: A. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work.

I can't get the most basic of basic routing to work.

Here's my network setup....

Intel computer with 512 ram and new xeon.
Two Intel PWLA8492MT Dual port Gig-E Cards plus 2 onboard intel Gig-E
ports.

DSL Modem (Subnet A)
     |
pfSense WAN (Subnet A)
     |
PfSense LAN (Subnet B)
     |
Computers with static public IPs (Subnet B)

Bridging is not an option as in the near future I want to cut subnet B
into two subnets and put each half subnet onto different interfaces.

I've tried going to advanced NAT and deleting all the rules while having
subnet B on LAN.
Deleting all the NAT rules while having subnet B on OPT1.
DISABLING THE FIREWALL!!! while having subnet B on LAN/OPT1.

I just can't get packets to get through.....
The joke is that it all works fine when I use the default rule created
for NAT.
But I don't want or need NAT for this setup.
I MUST have public, static IPs on the computers.... =o/

Please help!!!!

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to