Hi Bill,
Now that 1.0 is out what is the idea for moving to kernel 6.2? Any
idea of the time frame?
Could we find a solution to keep the interface numbering stable i.e.
when adding a NIC not have all interfaces renumbered? This is really
annoying, MacOSX which also uses FreeBSD, does do no this renumbering
so there must be a solution may be we should peek in Darwin code?
Thanks
Pierre
On 6-Sep-06, at 8:25 AM, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 9/6/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So if I understand correctly you are porting pfsense to 6.2 instead
of back porting the driver? That looks like a fabulous solution and
quite a bit more sustainable for the future.
Exactly. And takes the risk out of a backport (which looked like it
may end up being rather tedious). It also means that anyone can build
a RELENG_6 based image for any and all new hardware in RELENG_6 that
isn't in the branch we're tracking for 1.0. There is some risk of
stuff not working quite right of course, but that's why we're not
changing to RELENG_6_2 this late in the release cycle.
--Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
