Chris Flugstad wrote:
> Much Easier,  thanks Scott.
> 
> Also, I did a test on 2 routers (ex 192's) and now I am going to take it
> onsite and use to Public IP's, but they have the same GW, as they are my
> dsl lines.  I am the ISP.  Will there be any complications since they
> both have the same gateway?
> 
> Chris
> 
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>> Update to a recent snapshot or 1.2-BETA-1.
>>
>> Scott
>> PS: yes its stable.
>>
>> On 5/18/07, Chris Flugstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Im having a hard time getting this setup. I have the MultiWan/Load
>>> Balancing doc from PfSenseDocs, but it is slightly different.  When I
>>> try to put in the info, i get
>>>
>>>  The following input errors were detected:
>>>
>>> 192.168.10.99 is currently being referenced by an interface ip address
>>> on wan.
>>> 192.168.2.99 is currently being referenced by an interface ip address on
>>> opt1.
>>>
>>>
>>> 10.99 and 2.99 are my wan1 and wan2.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an uptodate HOWTO on this?
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
I notice my firewall rules and alias's look a little repetitive.  CAn I
do without some of the aliases since they are identical?

I left it the same, but will try this monday.  Also, would like to do
more installations like this, as I can get much more Bandwidth through
DSL lines than leasing t1's

chris

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to