Oh yes then he has to allow it from firewall... Regards Abdulrehman
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Sean Cavanaugh <[email protected]>wrote: > im assuming the webserver is behind the firewall and he wants to allow > people on the internet to be able to see it. > > *From:* Abdulrehman <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 01, 2009 11:06 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [pfSense Support] ISA to pfSense or Windows to FreeBSD - > FQDN and DNS > > No yo do not have to declare FQDN....and why you want to forward port 80 o > webserver....if your webserver is live then you dont have to do port > forwarding.. > > Regards > Abdulrehman > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Raleigh Guevarra <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am currently doing the migration from ISA to pfSense firewall and I have >> a webserver hosting different sites, when trying to duplicate the rules of >> ISA, I noticed the FQDN of the sites was declared in the firewall rules of >> ISA (I was not the one who setup the ISA server). >> >> >> >> What does this mean, FQDN in firewall rules? >> >> Do I really have to declare the FQDN in pfSense, instead of just forward >> port 80 to the webserver? >> >> All domains were set to our own NS servers (NS1 in W2k3 Active Directory, >> NS2 in Freebsd), is it safe and wise to use the pfSense gateway as the NS >> server to replace the current NS1 server? >> >> >> >> As you noticed, my ultimate goal is to replace the current windows boxes >> to BSD boxes. Any ideas and info would be greatly appreciated... Thank you >> in advance. >> >> >> >> Raleigh >> >>
