On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Raleigh Guevarra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am currently doing the migration from ISA to pfSense firewall and I have a > webserver hosting different sites, when trying to duplicate the rules of > ISA, I noticed the FQDN of the sites was declared in the firewall rules of > ISA (I was not the one who setup the ISA server). > > > > What does this mean, FQDN in firewall rules? >
Depends on how and where they're defined in ISA. Sometimes it's a substitute for IP address. ISA can also do reverse proxying and other things, so it can also be a number of other possibilities. I suspect it's probably just a substitute for an IP. > Do I really have to declare the FQDN in pfSense, instead of just forward > port 80 to the webserver? > You can't declare the FQDN in pfSense. You just forward port 80. > All domains were set to our own NS servers (NS1 in W2k3 Active Directory, > NS2 in Freebsd), is it safe and wise to use the pfSense gateway as the NS > server to replace the current NS1 server? > Not unless you configure a domain forward for your AD domain, otherwise you'll hose your AD. As long as you do that, you can use pfSense for DNS. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
