On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko<[email protected]> wrote: > John Sellens wrote: >> >> | From: Victor Padro <[email protected]> >> | | Again, use VLANs and configure the interfaces in Pfsense in order to >> | adquire IPs from each subnet: >> | | LAN: 192.168.10.1(or whatever you are using) >> | WAN: xy.xy.xy.10 >> | WAN1: ab.ab.ab.ab >> | WAN2(VLAN50): xy.xy.xy.20 >> | WAN3(VLAN60): xy.xy.xy.30 >> >> I think that would require a vlan capable switch on the WAN side, and >> I think the original poster (Jesse) said that wasn't an option from >> the ISP. >> >> I had a not-disimilar problem and eventually did some ugly things, >> which I'm not very happy with, but it's a stop-gap solution for me. >> >> I think pfSense 2.x is expected to fix this (with IP aliases), but >> in the meantime I suspect you'll have to add another physical >> interface on your firewall, put a little switch on the outside, and >> plug your cable modem and the two WAN interfaces into the switch. >> >> I suspect that you can't do it with VLANs, because the link from >> the ISP is untagged. >> >> Hope that helps - cheers! >> >> John >> [email protected] >> >> > > Your address scheme does not make sense without subnet numbers. Anyways I do > not think you can have the same gateway for all your three interfaces. > Eugene. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > >
Yes, you are right...I forgot that...just read it in your previous email. I step aside, then. -- Linux User #452368 http://twitter.com/vpadro Manifiesto por una cultura libre: http://culturalibre.org/ "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
