Interesting!  I'd be curious to know where you get with that.  What would you 
do about the PPAs, though?  My impression is that they need to be part of the 
signal chain, and that sending straight 48v phantom power to the TetraMic is 
somehow bad. 

cheers,

j

On Apr 17, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 05:44:08PM -0400, Jascha Narveson wrote:
> 
>> I was using the 6-foot extension cable yesterday.  I didn't try it today, so 
>> I can't comment on whether swapping out the cable today affected the RFI, or 
>> if was just a different day and wouldn't've happened in any case.
> 
> RF interference seems to be a recurrent problem with the Tetramic.
> I've experienced it on many occasions, and almost always leaving
> out the extension cable has removed or at least reduced the 
> interference. But it leaves you with the four PPAs and four
> standard mic cables gaffer-taped to the mic stand - not a view
> most concert audiences do appreciate.
> 
> I've been considering to modify the mic to have a short but more
> solid and better screened fixed cable terminating in a full-size
> 6-pin XLR, instead of the mini-xlr and the all too delicate 
> extension and breakout cables.
> 
> Ciao,
> 
> -- 
> FA
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> 

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to