On 07/03/2012 09:31, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 02:40:37AM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
Next in line, t'd seem that at least separation of diffuse sound from
direct sources and other DirAC-like processing could help track the
prominent sources, and so to see which kinds of loci they follow.
That is more or less what I had in mind. Split up the signal into
'grains' in the time/frequency domain, identify those that are likely
direct sounds, and build statistics of their L/R magnitude ratio and
phase difference. Match these again encoding hypotheses.
Ciao,
Do you actually need to match the encoding hypothesis, except for documentation purposes? You could
just build a matching decoder on the spot, couldn't you? Actually, one thing that occurs to me is
that maybe I've missed something but what do you match the statistics to do do this - surely you
would need to know the original positions of the sources to do anything meaningful?
Dave
--
These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer
/*********************************************************************/
/* Dave Malham http://music.york.ac.uk/staff/research/dave-malham/ */
/* Music Research Centre */
/* Department of Music "http://music.york.ac.uk/"; */
/* The University of York Phone 01904 322448 */
/* Heslington Fax 01904 322450 */
/* York YO10 5DD */
/* UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' */
/* "http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/3d_audio/"; */
/*********************************************************************/
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
