On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote: > Have you compared the results of having separate X,Y,U,V,P,Q > filters to generate the "panning" (which is how I interpret what you say > above) with pre-filtering the sounds then panning the filter outputs?
Not sure if I understand the question correctly... But if I do, that is how it works, except that the filtering and panning operations have been collapsed into a single operation. The IRs of all the panned filter outputs are summed, the result is a set of seven filters (the one for W is just a delay, as the others are linear-phase). So for a mono source we get a 1 by 7 convolution matrix, which in this case is the equivalent of 2048 individually panned filter outputs. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
