Thats probably it - but if it had been quieter it wouldnt have been heard at all or rather it would have sounded like a distant bee . The thing is when an insect flies really close to your ear its a really loud almost a physical sensation .I was trying to get that effect when I fly or mosquito flies really close to your ear and you brush it away. I would be difficult to get those sort of pressure levels any quieter from a loudspeaker on the other side of the path - Under the circumstances I was prepared to accept a one foot fly but to be realistic its not going to sound anything like real life without WFS or something similar (Im all for the "training a fly" solution myself) .
On 30 May 2012 18:24, Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Augustine Leudar wrote: > > > but anyone listening carefully would have heard a fly about 1 foot high ! > > This magnification effect has been reported many times. > I wonder how much it has to do with playing back at too high > levels. We do associate LF energy and size. Too much of it > and the source 'must be' big. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. > It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris > and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120530/57acbdc5/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
