> On 3 October 2012 20:39, Andrew Horsburgh <andrew.horsbu...@uws.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> >> Michael's right, AFAIK, that there hasn't been much modern use of beyond >> 5 speaker arrangements. I can't think of examples where an odd number of >> speakers has been used with ambisonic that wasn't to the ITU 775 >> standard shape. Perhaps someone on here can correct me? >>
Having recently set up an octagon (which must be the simplest poly after a square) without someone to hold the other end of the string (yes, I was using a laser _as_well_ ...) . . . I would venture to suggest 2n+1 poly's are just not 'marketable' ;-(> The original question was about a particular usage, so yes the generalities of 'ease of installation' do not kick in. Always nice to have one's prejudices corrected though (thanks Dave) ... anyone else ? Michael _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
