> There is no sound without time, so time being a dimension should strictly > speaking always result in a +1 on the dimension count from traditional > accounting... > > Ronald
Following Eero's notation, surely we should add + 0.5 D . . . unless we can move back in time Mind you some days I feel my 'progress' in time is not uniform but has some waveform 'mixed' with it ... Michael > > On 5 Mar 2014, at 12:53, Eero Aro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nah >> >> With my Serious Bloke hat on: >> >> Mono is 0,5 D sound. Distance and depth in front of the listener. >> >> Stereo is 1,5 D sound. Left-Right / distance and depth in front of the >> listener. >> >> Pantophonics is 2D. Front-Back, Left-Right. >> >> Periphonics is 3D. Front-Back, Left-Right, Up-Down. (Binaural also, if >> it would work.) >> >> Eero >> >> 5.3.2014 13:42, Dave Malham kirjoitti: >>> Ah, but if that's the case, mono is 2-D sound, stereo is 3-D >>> sound........ >>> :-) >>> >>> >>> On 5 March 2014 11:08, Ronald C.F. Antony <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 5 Mar 2014, at 11:58, Dave Malham <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> And now, 4-D sound >>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://createdigitalmusic.com/2014/03/full-immersion-audio-artists-explore-4dsound-spatial-grid-omni-speakers-ableton-max-lemur/ >>>>> >>>>> X, Y, Z and....... >>>> >>>> Time, it's 3-D sound in Space-Time ;) >>>> >>>> Ronald >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Sursound mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sursound mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
