G'day Bernie,
On Mon, 24 May 1999 07:48:56 +0200, Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you say that "4 GB is enough for anyone!" Let's check that out. If we
> assume that RAM will increase in the same speed as it has (eg. M$ is still
> in buissness)
You're telling me that you _won't_ want to run MS Word (version 103,
service pack 2597beta26) with the latest Thought Dictation Interface?
The one full of Wizards that write, print, publish and distribute the
entire novel as soon as you think about its title? ;-))))))
> or 2003 and DOS (almost any version) at 2100. (Win 3.x and 95 might have
> troubles at 2000 if you care about date order presented in WinFile)
Last year M$ did release (very, very quietly) Y2k-compliant updates to
the Windows 3.1/3.11 and Workgroups File Managers. These fix the date
problem so that eg: a file made on 4/4/2000 will be treated as newer
than one made on 4/4/1999. It doesn't cure MS Backup, but Backup was
always a dodgey product anyway.
If anyone wants a copy (specify 3.11 or WfW) send me a private email
and I'll post it back. If there's a lot of requests I'll put both
updates on my website for a few weeks. I don't think you will find them
on www.microsoft.com anymore.
cheers,
Fraser Farrell
http://www.dove.net.au/~fraserf/
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
