At 06:03 PM 12/7/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>So this means we start over from scratch? If I was to do that one then I
>would simply use the BeOS which now works with Windows 9.x and builds a
>partition for itself on installation. At least the BeOS has a track
>record of over five years of steady evolutionary progress...
>
>If I am off-base in my first analysis, then will someone explain the
>advantages to me.
>
>John O
What are the minimum requirements to run beos? What all multitasking 32
bit CLI operating systems are there available to run on something as light
as a 386 with only the smallest hard drive and yet have a fairly intuitive
user interface? It certainly isn't going to replace the other systems any
time soon, but V2 could reasonably be an option for people who want to keep
it very light.
bye,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(\
Yolanda ,,,,,,,,,,\\_/(\
UIN 4898262,,,..,,,Q Q \)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=(_T_)=
http://members.home.net/pippi5
{.. / .-.. --- ...- . / -... ..- -. -. .. . ... .-.-.- } A+
"There are only two things that are really infinite.
Space, and human stupidity." -- A. J. Einstein
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
