At 02:52 PM 5/8/00 -0600, you wrote:
>The man you mention also has the right
>to *CHOOSE* and if it means that much to him he is free to find
>another job or line of work where he doesn't have to use a
>computer. Here comes the hard part, where all the cry-babies
>start whining: what he must realize and understand is that there
>are consequences to his own choices and his employer also has the
>right to *CHOOSE* - and may very well choose to find someone more
>computer-friendly for his job. Yup, it's called being
>responsible for one's own actions (choices), a concept I realize
>that is becomming more and more unusual.
Must be nice to live in a world where you can go jobless and still eat, or
else where there are many jobs from which to choose, and many qualified
employees also for every job. His job is hard to find and hard to
fill. Darlin', it's a rock and a hard place and from what you've shared so
far, I'd say you appear to be living a very sheltered life or else are
fortunate enough to have alternate resources upon which to rely. Now, lest
you and I devolve into mudslinging, can we stop ranting and being harsh
upon each other and strangers about whom we know so little?
bye,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(\
Yolanda ,,,,,,,,,,\\_/(\
UIN 4898262,,,..,,,Q Q \)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=(_T_)=
http://members.home.net/pippi5
{.. / .-.. --- ...- . / -... ..- -. -. .. . ... .-.-.- } A+
Inertia. It's not just an object at rest tends to stay at rest; it's
also an object in motion tends to stay in motion.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
