My own holehearted praise for LSppp comes from the experience that it runs, since the latest amendments (as well as it did in its earlier version of Jan'01, btw) reliably and working fast - loaded into _low_ DOS memory.
REM-1: present version is _zero_ dot etc, 0.764 - and even expressedy declared as trial version. REM-2: never came to me to load it high; primarily because higher mem is fully crowded anyway with drivers and other stuff I want to have present always, and thus I am highly content with the additional feature of the small footprint of LSppp temporarily for net work. My guess is that your problem with it would indeed be linked with the highloading. Why not write to the autor and mail hin the precise diagnosis ? My expierinece was that he responded very eagerly, and immediately worked on, those error reports I sent him end of last/beginning of this year. // Heimo Claasen // <hammer at revobild dot net> // Brussels 2002-05-12 The WebPlace of ReRead - and much to read ==> http://www.revobild.net To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
