I meant to send this message to the softcon list a couple of days ago, but
mistakenly sent it to the tmonroe list. Apologies to those of you who may
be receiving it twice.

I just want to report to the list some preliminary success with installing a distro I 
found some time ago that billed itself as survpc-friendly. Only now have I gotten 
around to trying it, when all else failed. And it seems to have resolved the problems 
I was having. Let me give a brief report.

I have an old P75 I use at my office for light browsing, email and chat. I initially 
installed an old Red Hat version on it - 6.2. It ran ok using that, but try as I might 
during the install, I could only trim down the installation to about 400-500 MB. So, 
right after installation the HD was already about 90% full! Then, I needed an instant 
messaging (IM) client, so I loaded AOL's IM client for Linux. To make a long story 
short, that piece of software is crap, and it kept screwing up my system. I decided to 
try out GAIM, an opensource IM client written for Linux. I had an outdated RPM on that 
RH machine, so between upgrade hassles and paucity of disk space, I decided I should 
just go for an updated, trimmed down install of something else. I tried installing the 
latest Slackware, but even with substantial trimming it was more bloated than the old 
RH I was using. Tried a recent Debian with similar results. Neither of those, for 
whatever unfathomable reason, would giving me a wor!
king X install, nor would Libranet - a user-friendly Debian adaptation. I was getting 
to my wits' end with this. Then, Steven Darnold's latest efforts on Slack 8.1 seemed 
to offer some hope. But, once again, I was stumped by X and getting a working install.

Finally, I remembered Vectorlinux. I downloaded and burned a couple of CD's (they have 
differing install options), and had at my old P75 with them. I had to do considerable 
fiddling with refresh rates for this old monochrome monitor, but I finally got a 
working install of X. And the distro seems to run quite well on this old machine. It 
is only a 350 MB install and could doubtless be trimmed down alot more (it's basically 
a preconfigured system, so unused progs could be eliminated). It uses a recent version 
of Slackware, though I'm not sure which one. The newer apps like GAIM and Dillo will 
install fine on it. It has the very latest Linux kernel - 2.4.19, from which I'm 
considering "downgrading" since I don't need things like USB support on this machine. 
All-in-all, I think this distro is a good choice for lower-end hardware. Newbies might 
have a tough time of installing it, since the documentation is not especially well 
written, though. But this near-newbie did manage to get !
it going with just a few hitches.. I would say that Vectorlinux occupies a middle 
ground between the full-blown distros and BasicLinux: it offers smaller size and 
survpc tweaks (like allowing to use older versions of X), but still gives alot of the 
amenities of the major distros. It's way behind Steven in terms of system trimming, 
but takes a bit less savvy to get it up and running. I guess its edge over BL and the 
full-blown major distros with regard to survpc's is that it takes less geek-factor to 
get it to install and run. I'm not saying that BL is hard to install, but in terms of 
getting a working system (having things that I really need like an IM client) BL 
proved an insurmountable challenge. Trimming the major, full-blown distros down to a 
size amenable to this machine proved an equally insurmountable challenge for me. For 
those in my situation (i.e., having a deficiency of geek-factor but wanting to run 
Linux on older hardware), Vectorlinux may well be the way to go.

James

PS My guess is that Vectorlinux could work ok on anything down to a 486 with 16MB RAM, 
but probably not on anything less powerful (unless one didn't want X).

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to