On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:05:26PM +0000, Charles Angelich wrote: > Hello Steven - > > At 07:32 AM 3/1/03 +0000, you wrote: > >> > The only dust that settled was on 1.8 (and > >> > that was partially because of you). > >> > >> I'm guessing you are referring to my inability to > >> authenticate with my ISP? > > > >No, I was referring to your ability to alienate me. > > Keep it up and you may just equal that by alienating me. > Your time in the spotlight may be shorter than you think, > and being ignored by those you have stepped on may become > the 'norm'.
Look in the mirror. > >> EZNET will not connect regardless of anything I could > >> think of or others could suggest. > > > >The only way to clarify this problem is to determine > >*exactly* which method of authentication the offending > >ISP uses. PAP, CHAP, whatever. Note: I think there > >is a variant of PAP (?) provided by MicroSoft that is > >somewhat different from the standard. > > As Howard Eisenberg what his ISP uses. It won't work on > that one either. It's "Eisenberger". Actually, it's not eznet or my ISP that was the problem, it's me. I'm using an old external 14.4 USR Sportster (tiny compared to my Courier) on my test box and if I set the baud higher than 19200, eznet (or chat) doesn't work. The ISP's modem answers but doesn't respond at all. This is not an authentication problem. As long as I set the baud to 19200, both eznet and chat work fine (although I personally prefer chat, since it's what I'm used to). Sorry for the confusion. Howard E. To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
