On Mon 2007-07-23 20:19:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Okay, so this is done from userland, not from kernel.
> >
> >Does cpu frequency scaling work properly after we snapshot the system?
> >If yes, we should not need to do this.
> >If not, this is unsafe.
> >Which case is it?
> >
> >We may need to fix cpufreq a bit...
>
> It works correctly now.
> Previously it did not work because of SIGALARM and related issues.
> I worked with cpufreqd developer to solve all these.
Do you mean that cpufreqd is running while we suspend? That would be a
serious bug. But perhaps ondemand governor can do its job.
> But please notice that cpufreqd will enforce lower performance than
> requested during suspend.
?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
