another side comment: There were over a hundred different video cameras (private and commercial and from numerous different countries) pointed at the twin towers from time of impact to well after the structures collapsed. With the main strength members on the exterior of the building, any demolition explosive detonation after impact would have been shown clearly (numerous times) on the 10 pm television news. When the reality exists that those supermarket gossip newspapers pay hundreds and thousands of dollars for a photo of some famous person doing something embarrasing, what do you suppose taped footage of pre planned demolition of the world trade centers be worth?
--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, "Greg and April" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "csakima" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <biofuel@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 16:01 > Subject: [biofuel] It just the Odds Was: Doing it once is already hard > > > > I'm just saying that to have two independant events both causing two > > separate building come down in the same (GENERALLY, I agree it wasn't > > "exactly") demolition-perfect straight down ... sure was strange to me in > a > > crap-shoot "odds (what are the odds)" sorta way. Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
